MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Accurate State of Charge Estimation for Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery Cell Using Equivalent Circuit Model, Parameter Tuning and Unscented Kalman Filter

2022· article· en· W4281827116 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christopher Chibuzor Francis, Joyce Mwangama

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 5th International Conference on Energy, Electrical and Power Engineering (CEEPE) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMastercard Foundation
KeywordsState of chargeBattery (electricity)Kalman filterEquivalent circuitExtended Kalman filterComputer scienceBattery packConvergence (economics)Range (aeronautics)State (computer science)Control theory (sociology)VoltageEngineeringElectrical engineeringAlgorithmPower (physics)Control (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For an Electric Vehicle (EV), knowing the range capability before the next recharge session is dependent on the accuracy of the State of Charge (SOC) estimation. SOC is simply a measure of the amount of extractable charge from a battery cell or pack. Being a hidden state of a nonlinear dynamic system, SOC cannot be directly measured but must be accurately and precisely estimated. Many literatures have been synthesized to understand the methods for estimating battery state of charge in various use cases. However, there are scarcely any thorough reports. Hence, in this paper, we comprehensively investigate the employment of the unscented Kalman filter with a realistic battery equivalent circuit model. A battery model is designed, and the parameters are estimated by model correlation with experimental data. The results showed convergence of the simulated SOC estimate to the real SOC. We therefore make understandable, the state-of-the art technique that should be employed by Battery Management System (BMS) developers in performing an important battery management functionality – SOC estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 5th International Conference on Energy, Electrical and Power Engineering (CEEPE)Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207