MLBioIGE: integration and interplay of machine learning and bioinformatics approach to identify the genetic effect of SARS-COV-2 on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is a current concern for people worldwide. The virus has recently spread worldwide and is out of control in several countries, putting the outbreak into a terrifying phase. Machine learning with transcriptome analysis has advanced in recent years. Its outstanding performance in several fields has emerged as a potential option to find out how SARS-CoV-2 is related to other diseases. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) disease is caused by long-term lung injury, a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2. In this article, we used a variety of combinatorial statistical approaches, machine learning, and bioinformatics tools to investigate how the SARS-CoV-2 affects IPF patients' complexity. For this study, we employed two RNA-seq datasets. The unique contributions include common genes identification to identify shared pathways and drug targets, PPI network to identify hub-genes and basic modules, and the interaction of transcription factors (TFs) genes and TFs-miRNAs with common differentially expressed genes also placed on the datasets. Furthermore, we used gene ontology and molecular pathway analysis to do functional analysis and discovered that IPF patients have certain standard connections with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. A detailed investigation was carried out to recommend therapeutic compounds for IPF patients affected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".