The Impact of the Religious Thought and Beliefs on the Sustainability of Urban Process and Production
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationship between belief and the architectural and urban production of cities made up an important topic in various studies that dealt with the impact of religion on shaping the city. Considering that belief and transactions usually determine the activities practiced by the social system in the city. Where the performance of the social system is reflected in urban production and the relationship between the elements of the city. This study is a comparative study designed to determine the nature of the influence of religion and belief on the processes and sustainability of building products in different cultures (Iraqi, Egyptian, Greek, Roman, and Eastern civilizations). Where the problem was addressed according to a descriptive and analytical approach, that reveals the features of sustainability in the architecture process and product of ancient civilizations influenced by religious thought and beliefs. The method used to achieve the goal of this research begins by defining the sustainability characteristics of architecture, urban products and intellectual indicators as criteria for comparison, and then presenting the results and conclusions that have been reached.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it