MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281851267 · doi:10.2337/db22-848-p

848-P: Efficacy and Safety of GlucoLo Plus in Type 2 Diabetes Management

2022· article· en· W4281851267 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
ALEXANDRO R. ZARRUK

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboAdverse effectType 2 diabetesNauseaDiabetes mellitusLipid profileWeight lossInternal medicineBody mass indexTriglycerideGastroenterologyCholesterolObesityEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Diabetes is globally increasing in prevalence and patients are constantly on the lookout for Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM) that are safe and efficacious including biologically-based practices such as vitamins and dietary supplements. Methods: This double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial evaluated the effects of daily GlucoLo Plus, a newly formulated biologically-based CAM for diabetes type 2 management. The primary outcome was to evaluate the effect of GlucoLo Plus on HbA1c and the secondary outcomes were to assess its effect on fasting glycemia, lipid profile, weight and assess its safety profile. Results: Of 64 individuals assessed for eligibility, 60 (mean HbA1c 6.98% [52.8 mmol/mol], mean age 67.3 years [SD 9.5], 26 [43%] women, mean diabetes duration 3.2 years, and mean body mass index 27.9 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to GlucoLo Plus (n=32 [53%]) , or placebo (n=28 [47%]) . At 12 weeks, GlucoLo Plus decreased HBA1c by 0.843% (P=0.0121) while placebo reduced it by 0.132% (p = 0.5951) . GlucoLo Plus was also associated with non-significant reduction in fasting glycemia, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL-cholesterol. GlucoLo Plus arm had a mean 1.84 lbs weight loss while the placebo arm had a 0.21 lbs weight gain. The most frequent adverse events with GlucoLo Plus were mild and transient gastrointestinal events including nausea (9.3% vs. 3.5%) and dyspepsia (15.6% vs. 10.7%) . Conclusion: GlucoLo Plus significantly lowered HbA1c and had positive effect on bodyweight, fasting glycemia, LDL-cholesterol and had a minimal side effect profile. These results suggest that GlucoLo Plus could be an alternative and adjunct to type 2 diabetes management in people who are reluctant to initiate or add new antidiabetic agents. Disclosure A.R.Zarruk: Advisory Panel; Amgen Canada, AstraZeneca, Bausch Health, Canada, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eisai Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, HLS Therapeutics Inc., Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Sanofi, Takeda Canada, Valeant Pharmaceuticals, Other Relationship; Groupe Nature Pharma, Research Support; Abbott Diabetes, Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Orimed Pharma, Speaker's Bureau; Abbott, Abbott Diabetes, Amgen Canada, AstraZeneca, Bausch Health, Canada, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, HLS Therapeutics Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan N.V., Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Orimex Pharma, Sanofi, Takeda Canada, Valeant Pharmaceuticals, Viatris Inc. Funding Groupe Nature Pharma

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicPharmacological Effects of Natural CompoundsFrench-language works237,207