Indium Oxide Doped Polyaniline for Detection of Formaldehyde
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Polyaniline (PANI) and a polyaniline derivative (poly (2,5‐dimethyl aniline)) are evaluated for their sensitivity towards formaldehyde. Among the two polymer backbones evaluated, polyaniline seems more sensitive towards formaldehyde. Therefore, to further enhance sensitivity towards formaldehyde, polyaniline is doped with different weight percentages of indium oxide and further evaluated for its sensing capabilities such as sensitivity, selectivity, and stability. It is found that PANI with 1.25 wt% of In 2 O 3 is most sensitive towards formaldehyde, while PANI with 5 wt% of In 2 O 3 is most selective towards formaldehyde over benzene interferent. It is observed that sensitivity and selectivity trends for PANI doped with different wt% of In 2 O 3 are reverse of each other. All sensing materials are found stable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".