MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281872154 · doi:10.1155/2022/4947224

Experimental Analysis Using USRP for Novel Wavelet‐Based Spectrum Sensing for 2.2 GHZ Band Communication Using LabVIEW

2022· article· en· W4281872154 on OpenAlexaff
Kalpana Devi Perumal, E. D. Kanmani Ruby, M. Dhivya, G. Aloy Anuja Mary, V. Kavitha, Umamahesawari Kandasamy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nanomaterials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioUniversal Software Radio PeripheralInterference (communication)Computer scienceChannel (broadcasting)ThroughputSpectrum managementSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Radio spectrumElectronic engineeringSoftware-defined radioTelecommunicationsWirelessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spectrum sensing allows cognitive radio systems to detect relevant signals even in the presence of interference for reliable communication. Most of the existing spectrum sensing techniques use a particular signal‐to‐noise ratio model with assumptions and provide certain detection performance. Dynamic spectrum management techniques enabled the efficient allocation of channels to increasing number of users. In cognitive radio system, the dynamic spectrum management is efficient for sensing the channel occupancy and mobilizing the secondary user towards the unused primary user channel. For spectrum sensing, wavelet‐based spectrum sensing method is analyzed and effectively made spectrum decision. The performance analysis is made for various SNR values with enhanced false alarm and throughput in spectrum management cognitive radio system in 2.2 GHZ band communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NanomaterialsSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207