MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4281872248 · doi:10.1101/2022.05.30.494041

Thymus Antibody-Secreting Cells Represent a Tissue Specific Population That Possess an Activated Cellular Phenotype

2022· preprint· en· W4281872248 on OpenAlexaff
KimAnh T. Pioli, Kin H. Lau, Peter D. Pioli

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD154BiologyFlow cytometryImmunologyAntibodyPopulationCD40PhenotypeCell biologyCytotoxic T cellGeneMedicineGeneticsIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) are key contributors to humoral immunity through immunoglobulin production and the potential to be long-lived. ASCs have been recently identified in the thymus (THY) which is of interest as autoreactive THY B cells regulate T cell tolerance. Here, we showed that the young female THY was skewed towards higher production of ASCs relative to males. However, these differences disappeared with age. Intravenous labeling combined with blockade of CD154(CD40L) suggested that THY ASCs were generated in situ in a T cell dependent fashion. Single cell RNA-sequencing revealed that THY ASCs possessed a transcriptional signature indicative of interferon signaling and activation. Flow cytometry confirmed that THY ASCs had increased levels of Toll-like receptor 7 as well as the activation markers CD69 and major histocompatibility class II. Overall, THY ASCs are a unique population that require further investigation to fully appreciate their biological significance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicT-cell and B-cell Immunology→French-language works237,207→