MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281875571 · doi:10.2337/db22-576-p

576-P: Cocreating a Virtual Care Platform That Delivers Mental Health Support to Adults with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) Living in Rural and Remote Communities

2022· article· en· W4281875571 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tricia S. Tang, PARTEEK JOHAL, AYMAN AZHAR, Lawrence Fisher, WILLIAM H. POLONSKY, Matthias Görges

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeer supportDigital healthMental healthPsychologyNursingHealth careMedical educationMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: While mental health (MH) is the cornerstone of diabetes care, access to MH support in rural and remote communities in British Columbia (BC) is limited. The purpose of this study was to design REACHOUT, a virtual care platform, to deliver peer-led MH support to adults with T1D in geographically marginalized communities in BC. Methods: The REACHOUT platform was co-created by our T1D Patient Partner Team (n=16) and experts in digital health, biomedical engineering, behavioural science, and rural health. REACHOUT is built as a customizable extension to the Rocket.chat open-source platform, deployed privately on Amazon Web Services servers in Canada; it offers various forms of encryption to maintain data security. We applied an Agile iterative development approach with multi-staged feedback from T1D Patient Partners and key stakeholders in a participatory action framework. Results: The REACHOUT app has three support delivery features: 1) 1-ON-1 SUPPORT delivered by an individual Peer Supporter (PS) self-selected by the participant from a library of PS profiles. Profiles include descriptors such as stage of life, hobbies, and interests, sociodemographic information, diabetes history and treatment etc. Mode, content, and structure of communication are driven entirely by participants’ support preferences and needs; 2) 24/7 COMMUNITY CHAT ROOMoffers “just-in-time” group support and accommodates needs for emotional validation, normalization, and non-judgmental acceptance; 3) VIDEO HUDDLES are monthly PS-led virtual group sessions highlighting a distress or resilience related theme (e.g. workplace bias and discrimination, cooking low-carb, insurance coverage challenges) . Conclusions: Launched in November 2021, the REACHOUT pilot supports 40 participants with 40 PS. Adoption and utilization patterns for each of the support delivery mechanisms are being monitored and will be compared in mid-2022. Disclosure T.S.Tang: None. P.Johal: None. A.Azhar: None. L.Fisher: Consultant; Ascensia Diabetes Care, Research Support; Eli Lilly and Company. W.H.Polonsky: Consultant; Abbott Diabetes, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Dexcom, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Insulet Corporation, Intuity Medical, Inc., Provention Bio, Inc., Sanofi. M.Görges: Research Support; Careteam Technologies Inc, Excelar Technologies, IDENTOS Inc, MedStack Inc, SecureKey Technologies Inc, Smile CDR Inc, Thrive Health, Xerus Medical. Funding Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (2-SRA-2020-986-S-B)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationFrench-language works237,207