Adaptive Box–Cox Transformation: A Highly Flexible Feature-Specific Data Transformation to Improve Metabolomic Data Normality for Better Statistical Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metabolomic data normality is vital for many statistical analyses to identify significantly different metabolic features. However, despite the thousands of metabolomic publications every year, the study of metabolomic data distribution is rare. Using large-scale metabolomic data sets, we performed a comprehensive study of metabolomic data distributions. We showcased that metabolic features have diverse data distribution types, and the majority of them cannot be normalized correctly using conventional data transformation algorithms, including log and square root transformations. To understand the various non-normal data distributions, we proposed fitting metabolomic data into nine beta distributions, each representing a unique data distribution. The results of three large-scale data sets consistently show that two low normality types are very common. Next, we created the adaptive Box-Cox (ABC) transformation, a novel feature-specific data transformation approach for improving data normality. By tuning a power parameter based on a normality test result, ABC transformation was made to work for various data distribution types, and it showed great performance in normalizing skewed metabolomic data. Tested on a series of simulated data in Monte Carlo simulations, ABC transformation outperformed conventional data transformation approaches for both positively and negatively skewed data distributions. ABC transformation was further demonstrated in a real metabolomic study composed of three pairwise comparisons. Additional 84, 44, and 57 significant metabolites were newly confirmed after ABC transformation, corresponding to respective increases of 70.6, 13.4, and 22.9% in significant metabolites compared to the conventional metabolomic workflow. Some of these newly discovered metabolites showed promising biological meanings. ABC transformation was implemented in the R package ABCstats and is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/HuanLab/ABCstats).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".