Metabolic Alterations in Sputum and Exhaled Breath Condensate of Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Surgical Resection: A Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Every year, close to two million people world-wide are diagnosed with and die of lung cancer. Most patients present with advanced-stage cancer with limited curative options and poor prognosis. Diagnosis of lung cancer at an early stage provides the best chance for a cure. Low- dose CT screening of the chest in the high-risk population is the current standard of care for early detection of lung cancer. However, CT screening is invasive due to radiation exposure and carries the risk of unnecessary biopsies in non-cancerous tumors. In this pilot study, we present metabolic alterations observed in sputum and breath condensate of the same population of early- stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients cancer before and after surgical resection (SR), which could serve as noninvasive diagnostic tool. Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) (n=35) and sputum (n=15) were collected from early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients before and after SR. Median number of days for EBC and sputum collection before and after SR were 7 and 42; and 7 and 36 respectively Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) were used to analyze the metabolic profile of the collected samples. A total of 26 metabolites with significant alteration post SR were identified, of which 14 (54%) were lipids and 12 constituted nine different chemical metabolite classes. Eighteen metabolites (69%) were significantly upregulated and 8 (31%) were downregulated. Median fold change for all the up- and downregulated metabolites (LC-QTOF-MS) were 10 and 8, respectively. Median fold change (MFC) in concentration of all the up- and downregulated metabolites (NMR) were 0.04 and 0.27, respectively. Furthermore, glucose (median fold change, 0.01, p=0.037), adenosine monophosphate (13 log fold, p=0.0037) and N1, N12- diacetylspermine (8 log fold p=0.011) sputum levels were significantly increased post-SR. These identified sputa and EBC indices of altered metabolism could serve as basis for further exploration of biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer, treatment response, and targets for drug discovery. Validation of these promising results by larger clinical studies is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".