Engineering Solutions for the Stabilisation of a Hill Located in an Urban Area. Case Study: Las Cabras Hill, Duran-Ecuador
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For more than 20 years, problems related to erosive processes and landslides have been detected on Las Cabras hill in Duran, Ecuador. Las Cabras hill has a stability problem due to its sub-vertical slopes (north zone) due to rockfalls, slopes with a favourable slope to landslide (south zone) and two anthropic factors (houses in inappropriate places and a lack of sewer system). From previous studies, Las Cabras has been classified as high to very high susceptibility to landslide (soil) or detachment (rock). Therefore, there is a risk for families living in this area and its surroundings. This study aims to propose engineering solutions through the technical considerations of studies carried out to stabilise the Las Cabras hill and its surroundings. The methodology considers: i) analysis of the results of the engineering studies carried out on the hill, ii) design calculations according to the stability and safety analysis of the slopes employing Hoek and Bray method; and iii) proposal of stabilising solutions in the most susceptible areas of the hill. The solutions have to do with controlling erosive processes and rock masses that can slide or detach. Injected anchors (using gunite and Ø25mm rods) and mechinal drains are proposed to reduce pore pressure in that area. Also, it can be applied in combination with surface channels in the form of a ladder to evacuate rainwater. Ultimately, it is possible to rethink the territorial ordering on Las Cabras hill with these considerations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it