MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4281895629 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6607713

Canola Genetic Engineering for Long-Term Agriculture and Global Food Security

2022· article· en· W4281895629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Palak Naik, Nikhil Thakur, Nitu Rani

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanolaFood securityTerm (time)AgricultureBusinessAgricultural engineeringAgricultural economicsNatural resource economicsAgronomyEngineeringBiologyEconomicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Throughout the globe, abiotic stress is a serious threat to agriculture. Moreover, the extreme climatic conditions like drought, flooding, global warming and others are the major yield-limiting factors for crop plants and impacts forceful challenges to global crop production. Contribution of Brassica Napus is more towards the oilseed industry and has also achieved worldwide acceptance. It is the third most important source for vegetable oil for human consumption after palm and soybean oils. Canola crop is widely used as vegetable oil and meals for animals and is one of the first genetically modified crops to reach commercial markets of Canada. Genetic modification is required to protect these kinds of crops from various kinds of stress such as metal stress, extreme climatic conditions, drought and saltiness. In this review, we have discussed the current and future role of genetic engineered canola to sustainable agriculture systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicBiofuel production and bioconversion→French-language works237,207→