The impact of mentality and emotions in the creation of the magazine Claridade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter addresses the mentality and the emotions of the various individuals who created the magazine Claridade (1936). It considers how the creative power of the magazine’s founders and contributors was based on these two elements (mentality and emotions) and their observations of the Cape Verdean reality. We will consider two types of emotions – positive and negative – as described by Caruso Samel and references to other authors who approach this topic from a spiritual point of view, mainly that of Christian Rationalism, a philosophy that incorporates scientific elements).We will also show how human beings can form their ideas by exerting their own free will and reach the areas where Total, Absolute, and Universal Intelligence are. This concept is the founding principle of the magazine and the basis of the viewpoints of authors such as Onésimo Silveira. In short, this study confirms that the creation of the magazine Claridade was based on the two aforementioned types of emotions and its authors’ penchant for observation. These facts, influenced by free will, made this group feel that it was imperative to divulge the nature of the Cape Verde archipelago and Cape Verdean literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".