MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281900644 · doi:10.29173/isotl606

Looking Back/Looking Forward

2022· article· en· W4281900644 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michelle Yeo

Bibliographic record

VenueImagining SoTL · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWikis in Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)HistorySociologyVisual artsComputer scienceArtWorld Wide WebMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Welcome to the second issue of Imagining SoTL. This journal was conceptualized to build on presentations given at the annual Banff SoTL Symposium. As the Covid-19 pandemic stretched on, beyond what any of us could have initially imagined, we made the difficult decision to cancel the 2020 gathering. As a “pivot” for this second issue, given that we did not have presentations in 2020 to draw from, we invited all presenters from 2010–2019 to contribute to a special issue in celebration of the first nine years of the Symposium, with the theme of Looking Back/Looking Forward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0150.016
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0070.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0990.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImagining SoTLSame topicWikis in Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207