MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4281904210 · doi:10.1101/2022.06.02.494559

Zooanthroponotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and host-specific viral mutations revealed by genome-wide phylogenetic analysis

2022· preprint· en· W4281904210 on OpenAlexaff
Sana Naderi, Peter E. Chen, Carmen Lía Murall, Raphaël Poujol, Susanne A. Kraemer, Bradley Pickering, Selena M. Sagan, B. Jesse Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill Genome CentreUniversity of ManitobaMontreal Heart InstitutePublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversité de MontréalCanadian Food Inspection AgencyMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMinkPhylogenetic treeTransmission (telecommunications)GenomeEvolutionary biologyViral evolutionPhylogeneticsGeneticsGeneralist and specialist speciesVirologyGeneEcologyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a generalist virus, infecting and evolving in numerous mammals, including captive and companion animals, free-ranging wildlife, and humans. Transmission among non-human species poses a risk for the establishment of SARS-CoV-2 reservoirs, makes eradication difficult, and provides the virus with opportunities for new evolutionary trajectories, including selection of adaptive mutations and emergence of new variant lineages. Here we use publicly available viral genome sequences and phylogenetic analysis to systematically investigate transmission of SARS-CoV-2 between human and non-human species and to identify mutations associated with each species. We found the highest frequency of animal-to-human transmission from mink, compared with lower transmission from other sampled species (cat, dog, and deer). Although inferred transmission events could be limited by sampling biases, our results provide a useful baseline for further studies. Using genome-wide association studies, no single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were significantly associated with cats and dogs, potentially due to small sample sizes. However, we identified three SNVs statistically associated with mink and 26 with deer. Of these SNVs, ∼⅔ were plausibly introduced into these animal species from local human populations, while the remaining ∼⅓ were more likely derived in animal populations and are thus top candidates for experimental studies of species-specific adaptation. Together, our results highlight the importance of studying animal-associated SARS-CoV-2 mutations to assess their potential impact on human and animal health. Importance SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, can infect many animal species, making eradication difficult because it can be reseeded from different reservoirs. When viruses replicate in different species, they may be faced with different evolutionary pressures and acquire new mutations, with unknown consequences for transmission and virulence in humans. Here we analyzed SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences from cats, dogs, deer, and mink to estimate transmission between each of these species and humans. We found several transmission events from humans to each animal, but relatively few detectable transmissions from animals back to humans, with the exception of mink. We also identified three mutations more likely to be found in mink than humans, and 26 in deer. These mutations could help the virus adapt to life in these different species. Ongoing surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 from animals will be important to understand their potential impacts on both human and animal health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research→French-language works237,207→