MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281912489 · doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05497-1

Risk factors for postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4281912489 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Seung-Beom Han, Gi-Chang Kim, Kyun-Ho Shin

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHip fractureOdds ratioInternal medicineSurgeryCochrane LibraryHeart failureConfidence intervalOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a devastating complication that can frequently occur after hip fracture surgery. This study aimed to quantitatively and comprehensively summarize the risk factors for POP following hip fracture surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies assessing risk factors for POP following hip fracture surgery. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) between patients with and without POP were calculated. Evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Ten studies including 37,130 patients with hip fractures were selected. POP occurred in 1768 cases with an accumulated incidence of 7.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.061-0.094). Advanced age (SMD: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.10-0.90), male sex (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.12-2.01), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale ≥3 (OR: 3.17, 95% CI: 1.25-8.05), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.43-2.94), coronary heart disease (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.27-2.60), arrhythmia (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.04-2.15), congestive heart failure (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.14-1.75), chronic kidney disease (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.28-3.41), and cerebrovascular accident (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.60-2.85) were risk factors for POP. Hemoglobin (SMD: -0.14, 95% CI: - 0.25 to - 0.03), albumin (SMD: -0.97, 95% CI: - 1.54--0.41), blood urea nitrogen (SMD: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.03-0.37), alanine aminotransferase (SMD: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.10-0.44), arterial oxygen pressure (SMD: -0.49, 95% CI: - 0.71--0.27), time from injury to surgery (SMD: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.08-0.17), and surgery within 48 h (OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 2.40-5.85) were associated with the development of POP. CONCLUSION: Patients with the aforementioned risk factors should be identified preoperatively, and related prophylaxis strategies should be implemented to prevent POP following hip fracture surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.010
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Musculoskeletal DisordersSame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207