Bibliographic record
Abstract
Simulating quantum systems is one of the most important potential applications of quantum computers. The high-level circuit defining the simulation needs to be compiled into one that complies with hardware limitations such as qubit architecture (connectivity) and instruction (gate) set. General-purpose quantum compilers work at the gate level and have little knowledge of the mathematical properties of quantum applications, missing further optimization opportunities. Existing application-specific compilers only apply advanced optimizations in the scheduling procedure and are restricted to the CNOT or CZ gate set. In this work, we develop a compiler, named 2QAN, to optimize quantum circuits for 2-local qubit Hamiltonian simulation problems, a framework which includes the important quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). In particular, we exploit the flexibility of permuting different operators in the Hamiltonian (no matter whether they commute) and propose permutation-aware techniques for qubit routing, gate optimization and scheduling to minimize compilation overhead. 2QAN can target different architectures and different instruction sets. Compilation results on four applications (up to 50 qubits) and three quantum computers (namely, Google Sycamore, IBMQ Montreal and Rigetti Aspen) show that 2QAN outperforms state-of-the-art general-purpose compilers and application-specific compilers. Specifically, 2QAN can reduce the number of inserted SWAP gates by 11.5X, reduce overhead in hardware gate count by 68.5X, and reduce overhead in circuit depth by 21X. Experimental results on the Montreal device demonstrate that benchmarks compiled by 2QAN achieve the highest fidelity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".