Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DRAM systems continue to be plagued by the Row-Hammer (RH) security vulnerability. The threshold number of row activations (TRH) required to induce RH has reduced rapidly from 139K in 2014 to 4.8K in 2020, and TRH is expected to reduce further, making RH even more severe for future DRAM. Therefore, solutions for mitigating RH should be effective not only at current TRH but also at future TRH. In this paper, we investigate the mitigation of RH at ultra-low thresholds (500 and below). At such thresholds, state-of-the-art solutions, which rely on SRAM or CAM for tracking row activations, incur impractical storage overheads (340KB or more per rank at TRH of 500), making such solutions unappealing for commercial adoption. Alternative solutions, which store per-row metadata in the addressable DRAM space, incur significant slowdown (25% on average) due to extra memory accesses, even in the presence of metadata caches. Our goal is to develop scalable RH mitigation while incurring low SRAM and performance overheads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it