Resistance to <i>Saprolegnia parasitica</i> infection: A heritable trait in Atlantic salmon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A controlled Saprolegnia parasitica infection model was used to challenge 1158 fish representing 105 pedigreed Atlantic salmon families to evaluate the possibility of selecting for Saprolegnia resistance in a commercial breeding programme. Fish were infected in five study tanks and observed for 40 days post-infection for lesion score and survival. Survival analysis of the top 10 resistant and bottom 10 susceptible families indicated that the hazard of dying following Saprolegnia infection was 1509% higher in susceptible families. In all fish, a 10 g increase in weight correlated with a 7.8% increase in the hazard of dying while sex did not affect mortality. Resistance to Saprolegnia was estimated to have a heritability of 0.25, indicating that selection is possible. Genetic and phenotypic correlations indicated that the 11-point scoring system, developed in this study to quantify Saprolegnia infection severity, had a high negative correlation with survival as days to mortality at ≥-0.922(±0.005), suggesting that the scoring method could help assess lesion development in studies where mortality is not the primary biological endpoint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".