MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4281955004 · doi:10.14712/23366478.2022.27

Ako ďaleko sme si ešte blízki (na príklade rozhodovania o nemajetkovej ujme na zdraví)

2022· article· en· W4281955004 on OpenAlex
Anton Dulak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAUC IURIDICA · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDiverse Legal and Medical Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Network for Innovation in Education
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompensation (psychology)ExpansiveCzechStatutory lawLawState (computer science)Civil codeBusinessInterpretation (philosophy)PersonalityPolitical sciencePsychologyMathematicsSocial psychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of private law in the last two decades has been marked by an increase in actions for compensation for non-pecuniary damage to health and life. Claimants’ demands for the amount of compensation also grew. The legal institutes traditionally set up for this purpose (compensation for pain and suffering and compensation for hardship) soon proved inadequate. The courts began to remedy the lack of, or insufficient, statutory regulation by an expansive interpretation of the provisions on the protection of personality. Court decisions thus continued to harmonise the legal status in the countries of the former common state of Czechs and Slovaks. However, the adoption of the new Civil Code in the Czech Republic in 2012 ushered in a qualitatively new stage in the development of private law.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it