An Intelligent Manufacturing Approach Based on a Novel Deep Learning Method for Automatic Machine and Working Status Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smart manufacturing uses robots and artificial intelligence techniques to minimize human interventions in manufacturing activities. Inspection of the machine’ working status is critical in manufacturing processes, ensuring that machines work correctly without any collisions and interruptions, e.g., in lights-out manufacturing. However, the current method heavily relies on workers onsite or remotely through the Internet. The existing approaches also include a hard-wired robot working with a computer numerical control (CNC) machine, and the instructions are followed through a pre-program path. Currently, there is no autonomous machine tending application that can detect and act upon the operational status of a CNC machine. This study proposes a deep learning-based method for the CNC machine detection and working status recognition through an independent robot system without human intervention. It is noted that there is often more than one machine working in a representative industrial environment. Therefore, the SiameseRPN method is developed to recognize and locate a specific machine from a group of machines. A deep learning-based text recognition method is designed to identify the working status from the human–machine interface (HMI) display.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".