Characterization of CD20 expression loss as a mechanism of resistance to mosunetuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
7526 Background: Mosunetuzumab (M) is a bispecific antibody targeting CD20 and CD3 that redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells being developed for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL). CD20 is an optimal target, with uniform expression across B-NHL histologies and minimal receptor turnover. We characterized CD20 loss as a potential mechanism of resistance to M in patients (pts) on a Phase I/II trial (NCT02500407) receiving M monotherapy for the treatment (tx) of R/R B-NHL. Methods: Pts with R/R B-NHL received M intravenously in 3-week cycles, for eight to 17 cycles depending on tumor response. At baseline (BL), biomarker-evaluable (archival or fresh) biopsies were collected from 293 pts. Biopsies from 62 pts were collected at additional time points during tx with M and/or at disease progression (PD). The proportion of CD20+ and PAX5+ tumor cells was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using dual-staining with anti-CD20 (clone L26, VENTANA) and anti-PAX5 (clone DAK-PAX5, DAKO) antibodies. Expression of MS4A1, the gene encoding CD20 , was measured by RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq); MS4A1 mutation profiling was performed by whole exome sequencing (WES). Levels of CD20 expression were assessed relative to response rates. Correlative analyses were performed and assessed centrally (IHC, RNA-seq, and WES) and locally (IHC). Results: CD20 levels were consistently high ( > 75% CD20+PAX5+ cells) in the majority of BL biopsies and generally comparable across histologies (FL, DLBCL, tFL, MCL, and RT). BL CD20 loss (≤5% CD20+PAX5+ cells) was seen in 16/293 pts (5.5%), more commonly in aggressive NHL, and responses to M were not seen in these pts. Among 62 pts with BL and on-tx/at-PD biopsies, BL CD20 levels were ≤5% in 7/62 pts (11%) (6/7 pts [86%] progressed before completing Cycle 2). CD20 levels were maintained in on-tx biopsies from 23/24 pts (96%). At PD, biopsies showed CD20 loss in 7/26 pts (27%). For five pts with BL, on-tx and at-PD biopsies, all pts maintained CD20 while on-tx and 1/5 pts (20%) had CD20 loss at PD. There was no clear association between CD20 reduction and histology. Data from 185 BL biopsies showed generally concordant levels of CD20 gene and protein expression (r = 0.72). In 10/185 pts (5%), MS4A1 was expressed without detectable CD20 protein expression; DNA sequencing revealed novel mutations in MS4A1, including mutations leading to truncation of the protein. CD20 transmembrane and extra-cellular domain mutations were also observed but do not block CD20 expression. Conclusions: In pts with R/R B-NHL treated with M, low BL CD20 expression is associated with lack of response to M. During M tx, loss of tumor cell expression of CD20 is one mechanism of acquired resistance; however, CD20 expression is maintained in most pts with PD, implying alternative mechanisms for acquired M resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT02500407.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".