Mo<sub>2</sub>C-MoS<sub>2</sub> heterojunction a suitable and stable electrocatalyst for HER and supercapacitor Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the present work, Mo 2 C-MoS 2 heterojunction structures have been prepared by the wet impregnation method. For heterojunction species, the content of MoS 2 was varied from 5 to 20% by weight. The effect of the loading content of MoS 2 over Mo 2 C on hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) activity and electrochemical (EC) capacitance performance has been studied in detail. The Mo-C-S junction plays a key role in enhancing the HER activity and EC capacitance performance than the individual components. The prepared structures show enhanced HER activity with high current density ~36.2-78.3 mAcm -2 at very low applied potential (0.45 V), exhibiting a lower Tafel slope of 102.4 mVdec -1 . The EC capacitor performance determined by CV and galvanic charge-discharge (GCD) reveals that the synthesized samples exhibit an electrochemical double-layer capacitor (EDLC, C dl ) behavior. The higher EDLC (43.9 mFcm -2 ) and specific capacitance (2Fg -1 ) obtained for the synthesized samples determine their potential applicability for the new generation supercapacitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".