MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282000932 · doi:10.1117/12.2607977

Virtual labelling in photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy through time-domain feature extraction

2022· article· en· W4282000932 on OpenAlexaff
Marian Boktor, Nicholas Pellegrino, Benjamin R. Ecclestone, Paul Fieguth, Parsin Haji Reza

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSIGNAL (programming language)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceFeature extractionFeature (linguistics)Raster graphicsTime domainPhotoacoustic imaging in biomedicineRaster scanMicroscopyPattern recognition (psychology)Materials scienceOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoacoustic Remote Sensing (PARS®) is a non-contact, label-free imaging modality that provides optical absorption contrast in biological tissues. Images are formed by raster-scanning over a target. A time-domain signal is collected at each point, representing initial pressure-induced via the photoacoustic effect. Conventionally, only the amplitude of the time-domain signals is considered to estimate pixel values, disregarding the rich temporal information present in the signals. For instance, the signal shape carries information, which may be related to specific biological structures. In this work, clustering based on signal shape is explored, followed by feature extraction, enabling the virtual labeling of PARS images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207