MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282004804 · doi:10.36095/banxico/di.2022.06

The Role of Clusters in the Performance of the Mexican Economy

2022· book· es· W4282004804 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Innovation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este documento sigue un algoritmo que considera diferentes dimensiones de los vínculos entre las industrias de servicios y manufactura para identificar una configuración de clúster para la economía mexicana y analizar su papel en el desempeño económico de las regiones. Se identifican 24 clústeres y se analiza su distribución geográfica, su papel en el crecimiento regional, la evolución de su concentración del empleo y sus efectos indirectos. Los principales hallazgos sugieren que los clústeres orientados a la manufactura tienen una fuerte presencia en los estados del norte del país, mientras que los clústeres orientados a servicios en las entidades del centro. Finalmente, clústeres tales como la fabricación de productos plásticos; servicios de comida y venta al por menor; fabricación de alimentos y bebidas; y la industria automotriz muestran efectos directos e indirectos relativamente altos en la economía.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRegional Development and InnovationFrench-language works237,207