MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

To Clarify Decision on Action of Concentrated Force to Elastic Quarter-Space for Arbitrary Poisson’s Ratio

2022· article· en· W4282007512 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
С. В. Босаков

Bibliographic record

VenueScience & Technique · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotropyQuarter (Canadian coin)Space (punctuation)Action (physics)MathematicsMathematical analysisPoisson distributionFace (sociological concept)Poisson's ratioHalf-spaceHomogeneousGeometryIsotropic solidPoisson's equationCompressibilityPhysicsMechanicsComputer scienceOpticsStatisticsQuantum mechanicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previously, the author obtained an analytical solution for determining the vertical displacements of the homogeneous isotropic quarter-space face, which is affected by a vertical concentrated force. This expression gave an exact solution for determining the vertical displacements of a quarter-space face made of incompressible material and an approximate solution for a Poisson ratio different from 0.5. Later, in the published paper by S. V. Bosakov and P. D. Skachek “Action of Concentrated Force on 1/8 of Homogeneous Isotropic Space”, it was shown that by combining solutions for determining the vertical displacements of a quarter-space and a half-space from the action of concentrated forces, one can find vertical displacements for one-eighth face of a homogeneous isotropic space. The resulting expressions allow solving contact problems for non-classical domains in the form of a quarter of a space and one eighth of a space. Below, the author obtains the first approximation for displacements of a quarter-space face from the action of a vertical concentrated force. In this paper, the author gives the first approximation for determining the vertical displacements of a quarter-space face from the action of a vertical concentrated force, widely using the special approximation method developed in the works of V. M. Alexandrov and allowing to calculate successfully improper integrals. The constructed graphs show good results when determining displacements with a Poisson’s ratio different from 0.5 and equal to 0.5. It should be noted that the approach indicated in the paper by S. V. Bosakov and P. D. Skachek can be successfully used in determining all displacements of the faces of one-eighth face of a homogeneous isotropic sharpened forces tangent to the edge of a quarter-space and this will allow to solve contact problems taking into account friction forces in the contact zone of the beam or plate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience & TechniqueSame topicMaterial Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207