MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282014566 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsac079.471

0474 Three-arm randomised controlled trial of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia, a responsive bassinet, and sleep hygiene for preventing postpartum insomnia: Preliminary findings on maternal insomnia and sleep outcomes (Study for Mother-Infant Sleep)

2022· article· en· W4282014566 on OpenAlexaff
Nina Quin, Liat Tikotzky, Laura Astbury, Lesley Stafford, Jane Fisher, Joshua F. Wiley, Bei Bei

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsomniaMedicineSleep hygieneRandomized controlled trialCognitive behavioral therapy for insomniaSleep disorderPhysical therapyPregnancyPolysomnographyPostpartum periodCognitive behavioral therapyPediatricsPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Insomnia symptoms are common during the perinatal period and are linked to adverse parent/infant outcomes. This single-blind 3-arm randomised controlled trial examined how two interventions targeting different mechanisms prevent postpartum insomnia compared to sleep hygiene control. Trial registration: ACTRN12619001166167. Methods Participants were nulliparous females 26-32 weeks gestation with self-reported insomnia symptoms (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] scores ≥ 8). Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to: (a) a responsive bassinet designed to support infant sleep until 6 months postpartum (RB), (b) therapist-assisted cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) delivered during pregnancy and postpartum, or (c) a sleep hygiene booklet (control condition; CTRL). Outcomes were assessed at baseline (T1), 35-36 weeks gestation (T2), and 2, 6, and 12 months postpartum (T3-T5). The primary outcome is ISI scores averaged T3-T5. Secondary outcomes are PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (SDI), Sleep-Related Impairment (SRI), and self-report total sleep time (TST). We report preliminary results on T1-T4 as T5 is ongoing. Multiple regression analyses controlling for baseline outcomes examined group differences at post-baseline timepoints. Results 127 participants were randomised (age M±SD=32.62±3.49; RB = 44, CBT-I = 42, CTRL = 41), and 118 (92.9%) completed T4. Compared to CTRL, CBT-I had lower ISI, SDI, and SRI at T2, T3, and T4 (all p<.05 except p=.07 and .06 for ISI at T3 and T4; Cohen’s d ranges 0.39-0.99); differences in TST were non-significant at all timepoints (all p>.25). The RB condition had significantly longer TST at T4 (40.10 min longer, p=.008, d=.63) compared to CTRL, but these two conditions did not differ significantly on any other measures across all timepoints (p>.22). Conclusion Preliminary findings suggest CBT-I was efficacious in preventing insomnia symptoms and reducing sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment, but did not increase maternal sleep duration postpartum. Conversely, a responsive bassinet designed to support infant sleep meaningfully increased maternal sleep duration at 6 months postpartum but did not prevent insomnia symptoms. These initial findings suggest that perinatal sleep complaints are a multifactorial problem that likely require multi-component interventions targeting different causes and mechanisms. Support (If Any) National Health and Medical Research Council, Department of Education and Training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207