MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282019082 · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3176814

Volumetric Fetal Flow Imaging With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2022· article· en· W4282019082 on OpenAlexafffund
Datta Singh Goolaub, Jiawei Xu, Eric Schrauben, Davide Marini, John‏ Kingdom, John G. Sled, Mike Seed, Christopher K. Macgowan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
FundersPeterborough K. M. Hunter Charitable FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingBlood flowDuctus venosusCardiac cycleCardiac imagingInferior vena cavaMedicineMultisliceBiomedical engineeringComputer scienceNuclear medicineRadiologyFetusCardiologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fetal development relies on a complex circulatory network. Accurate assessment of flow distribution is important for understanding pathologies and potential therapies. In this paper, we demonstrate a method for volumetric imaging of fetal flow with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fetal MRI faces challenges: small vascular structures, unpredictable motion, and inadequate traditional cardiac gating methods. Here, orthogonal multislice stacks are acquired with accelerated multidimensional radial phase contrast (PC) MRI. Slices are reconstructed into flow sensitive time-series images with motion correction and image-based cardiac gating. They are then combined into a dynamic volume using slice-to-volume reconstruction (SVR) while resolving interslice spatiotemporal coregistration. Compared to prior methods, this approach achieves higher spatiotemporal resolution ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1\times 1\times 1$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> , ~30 ms) with reduced scan time – important features for the quantification of flow through small fetal structures. Validation is demonstrated in adults by comparing SVR with 4D radial PCMRI (flow bias and limits of agreement: −1.1 ml/s and [−11.8 9.6] ml/s). Feasibility is demonstrated in late gestation fetuses by comparing SVR with 2D Cartesian PCMRI (flow bias and limits of agreement: −0.9 ml/min/kg and [−39.7 37.8] ml/min/kg). With SVR, we demonstrate complex flow pathways (such as parallel flow streams in the proximal inferior vena cava, preferential shunting of blood from the ductus venosus into the left atrium, and blood from the brain leaving the heart through the main pulmonary artery) for the first time in human fetal circulation. This method allows for comprehensive evaluation of the fetal circulation and enables future studies of fetal physiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingSame topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207