MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282023526 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac079.044

RARE-19. Molecular characterization and treatment response of metastatic DIA/DIG

2022· article· en· W4282023526 on OpenAlexaff
James Petropoulos, Melanie Finkbeiner, Zarina Assis, Clare Gallagher, Walter Hader, Jennifer A. Chan, Douglas Strother, Lucie Lafay‐Cousin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVincristineCarboplatinAdjuvant therapyAdjuvantSurgeryChemotherapyOncologyInternal medicineCisplatinCyclophosphamide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma (DIA) and desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma (DIG) are glioneuronal tumors of early childhood. Surgical resection is usually sufficient to cure these benign tumors. The presence of metastatic seeding is rare and has been reported as an adverse prognostic factor. We present 2 cases of young children with recurrent metastatic DIA/DIG to describe their presentation, therapeutic management and outcome and to highlight the importance of molecular characterization of these rare tumors to guide adjuvant therapy. CASES DESCRIPTION: The first patient developed metastatic recurrence after initial gross total resection (GTR) of a localized DIG. The disseminated relapse was treated with monthly carboplatin and vincristine (CB/VCR). Complete response was achieved after 15 cycles and the patient has remained in continuous complete remission for 5 years. Post hoc molecular analysis of the tumor revealed a BRAF-RDX fusion. The second patient presented with a disseminated intraventricular relapse following an incomplete resection of a DIA associated with a SPECC1L-NTRK2 fusion. The patient received 2 cycles of CB/VCR with minimal response and was then switched to Larotrectinib leading to a very good partial response (VGPR) 3 months into therapy and has remained on treatment since then with significant clinical improvement. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: In our 2 cases, metastatic recurrence was responsive to adjuvant therapy leading to complete response with conventional chemotherapy in the first one and to VGPR with NTRK inhibitor in the second patient. Early molecular characterization of these benign tumors is critical in case of incomplete resection or metastatic seeding to widen therapeutic options and maximize chance of cure. Response with NTRK inhibitor appears rapid and significant but the total duration of treatment and sustainability of response after discontinuation remain unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207