Levodopa ONOFF-state freezing of gait: Defining the gait and non-motor phenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Freezing in the levodopa-medicated-state (ON-state) is a debilitating feature of Parkinson's disease without treatment options. Studies detailing the distinguishing features between people with freezing of gait that improves with levodopa and those whose freezing continues even on levodopa are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the gross motor, gait, and non-motor features of this phenotype. METHODS: Instrumented continuous gait was collected in the levodopa-medicated-state in 105 patients: 43 non-freezers (no-FOG), 36 with freezing only OFF-levodopa (OFF-FOG) and 26 with freezing both ON- and OFF-levodopa (ONOFF-FOG). Evaluation of motor and non-motor disease features was undertaken using validated scales. A linear mixed model with age, sex, disease duration, and motor UPDRS scores as covariates was used to determine differences in spatiotemporal gait and non-motor disease features among the groups. RESULTS: Compared to OFF-FOG, the ONOFF-FOG group had greater disease severity (on the Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale) and worse cognition (on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Frontal Assessment Battery and Scales for Outcome in Parkinson's disease-Cognition scales) and quality of life (on the PDQ-39), but similar mood (on the Hamilton depression and anxiety scales) and sleep quality (on Epworth sleepiness scale and RBD questionnaire). For several gait features, differences between the ONOFF-OFF groups were at least as large and in the opposite direction as differences between OFF-no groups, controlling for disease severity. Variability in ONOFF-FOG was greater than in other groups. Using results from our study and others, a power analysis for a potential future study reveals sample sizes of at least 80 ONOFF and 80 OFF-FOG patients would be needed to detect clinically meaningful differences. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-patient variability in spatiotemporal gait features was much greater in ONOFF-FOG than in the other two groups. Our results suggest that multifactorial deficits may lead to ONOFF-FOG development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".