Genetic evidence for parthenogenesis in small carpenter bee, <i>Ceratina dallatoreana</i> in its native distribution area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Arrhenotoky is typical mode of reproduction for Hymenoptera – females originate from fertilized eggs, males from unfertilized eggs. However, some lineages of Hymenoptera have switched to thelytoky, where diploid females originate instead from unfertilized diploid eggs. In the contras with some other hymenopteran lineages, thelytoky is generally very rare in bees. Here, we examined reproduction in the small carpenter bee Ceratina dallatoreana , which is assumed to be thelytokous. We compared genotype of microsatellite loci between mothers and their offspring. Offspring were genetically identical with mother in all cases. We did not detect any male offspring. Therefore, we conclude that parthenogeny is the prevailing, and perhaps obligate, mode of reproduction in C. dallatoreana . Offspring were clones of their mother with no observed decrease of heterozygosity. Thus the cytological mode of parthenogenesis is apomixis, or automimic with central fusion and extremely reduced or non-existing recombination. Ceratina bees are originally facultatively eusocial, therefore thelytoky may influence social evolution by causing extremely high within-colony relatedness. However, to date no multifemale nests have been recorded in C. dallatoreana .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".