MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282051893 · doi:10.4108/eai.9-6-2022.174181

Review on One-Stage Object Detection Based on Deep Learning

2022· article· en· W4282051893 on OpenAlexaff
Hang Zhang, Rayan S Cloutier

Bibliographic record

VenueICST Transactions on e-Education and e-Learning · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningArtificial intelligenceObject detectionComputer scienceObject (grammar)Field (mathematics)Internet of ThingsObject-class detectionComputer visionStage (stratigraphy)Face (sociological concept)The InternetPedestrianFace detectionPattern recognition (psychology)Facial recognition systemGeographyComputer securityWorld Wide WebArchaeologySociologyMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a popular research direction in computer vision, deep learning technology has promoted breakthroughs in the field of object detection. In recent years, the combination of object detection and the Internet of Things (IoT) has been widely used in the fields of face recognition, pedestrian detecti

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICST Transactions on e-Education and e-LearningSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207