Repeated subcutaneous racemic ketamine in treatment-resistant depression: case series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interest in the use of parenteral ketamine has been increasing over the last 2 decades for the management of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). While intravenous (IV) ketamine has been the most common parenteral route of administration, subcutaneous (SC) and intramuscular options have been described. We developed a clinical treatment protocol for the use of repeated SC racemic ketamine (maximum six treatments, twice per week) in an inpatient psychiatric care setting with inclusion/exclusion criteria, dosing schedule, and description of treatment, assessment, and monitoring procedures. Results from the first 10 consecutive patients demonstrated the effectiveness of SC racemic ketamine in relieving symptoms of TRD as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Report (QIDS-SR 16 ). Response (≥50% reduction in scores from baseline to endpoint) was achieved in 8/10 cases on the MADRS and 6/10 on the QIDS-SR 16 . Remission was achieved in 8/10 (based on MADRS ≤10) and 5/10 (based on QIDS-SR 16 ≤6). Patients tolerated the treatments well with only transient blood pressure changes and dissociative side effects. Repeated SC ketamine treatments could be a safe, feasible, and effective alternative to IV ketamine infusions for patients with TRD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".