MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282564736 · doi:10.33349/2022.106.5121

Roigé Ventura. X y Canals Ossul, A. (ed.) Patrimonios confinados: Retos del patrimonio inmaterial ante el COVID-19

2022· article· es· W4282564736 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriela Sánchez

Bibliographic record

VenuePH. Boletín del Instituto Andaluza del Patrimonio Histórico/PH/PH. Boletín del Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico/Boletín informativo - Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Art2019-20 coronavirus outbreakPolitical scienceBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patrimonios confinados: Retos del patrimonio inmaterial ante el COVID-19 nos presenta un enriquecedor registro de experiencias diversas donde se reflejan los aspectos más significativos del impacto social sobre el patrimonio inmaterial. Sin dramatismos y con realismos, en sus escritos se defiende la capacidad del patrimonio inmaterial como certero aglutinante y activador de las prácticas comunitarias y de sus saberes. Una diversidad de relatos de especialistas de la cultura nos cuentan lo vivido por comunidades de América y Europa durante la crisis sanitaria global que impactó el normal desarrollo de las celebraciones, fiestas, performances y otras tantas y diversas manifestaciones del Patrimonio Cultural Inmaterial (PCI).
 Patrimonio inmaterial - Patrimonio y Covid- Confinamiento y patrimonio inmaterial- cultura en COVID

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0140.016
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.008
Bibliometrics0.0100.017
Science and technology studies0.0410.019
Scholarly communication0.0050.015
Open science0.0170.010
Research integrity0.0090.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePH. Boletín del Instituto Andaluza del Patrimonio Histórico/PH/PH. Boletín del Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico/Boletín informativo - Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio HistóricoSame topicArchaeology and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207