Analytical Approach Based on Full-Space Synergy Technology to Optimization Support Design of Deep Mining Roadway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stability of surrounding rock is the basic guarantee of underground space engineering safety. The large deformation of a roadway’s surrounding rock is a very common phenomenon during the underground excavation of coal mine roadways or coal mining, especially in deep soft rock mining roadways. With the increase in mining depth and mining stress, it is very important to prevent disasters caused by surrounding rock deformation. This work aims to conduct an optimization design of roadway support for deep soft rock in coal mines using a full-space synergy control technology. FLAC3D-based orthogonal numerical experiments are adopted to study the influence of bolt parameters and plastic yield zone variation on the deformation of roadway surrounding rock, which provides a basis for optimizing the support design of coal mine roadways. According to the results of the numerical analysis, the optimal support parameters are determined as 20 mm, 2.2 m and 700–900 mm for diameter, length and interval of the bolt, respectively. Finally, the determined bolt-shotcrete net beam support scheme from the full-space synergy control idea is used in a study case. Results illustrate that this study can provide reliable guidance for the stability control of deep soft rock roadways in mining fields under high stress, and it can work well to keep the surrounding rock deformation within the safe limits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".