MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282585783 · doi:10.2514/6.2022-2925

Time-domain simulations of the noise propagation in porous media and its surroundings using the Discontinuous Galerkin Method

2022· article· en· W4282585783 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Deconinck, Benjamin de Brye, Xavier Robin, B. Meys

Bibliographic record

Venue28th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics 2022 Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscontinuous Galerkin methodFrequency domainComputer scienceGalerkin methodAnechoic chamberNoise (video)Porous mediumAcousticsRobustness (evolution)Time domainFinite element methodEuler equationsMathematical analysisMathematicsPhysicsStructural engineeringEngineeringPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis of noise mitigation mechanisms requires efficient numerical models. Accurate simulations of the noise propagation in porous media and its interactions with the surroundings are for this purpose essential. Many modeling approaches have been implemented in a classical Finite Element (FE) framework for frequency-domain simulations. Those are accurate and well suited for the design of acoustic treatments, but they have some inherent limitations when the size of the acoustic domain is large (volume larger than 10-100 m³) and at high frequencies (above 1000 Hz). The proposed time-domain approach complements the Actran DGM software where the Linearized Euler Equations (LEE) are solved using discontinuous Galerkin method and is suited for predicting the noise propagation in complex physical conditions. Auxiliary differential equations are used to model the porous material response with a multipole decomposition. The main advantage with this model is its ability to be used by any equivalent fluid models. Functional validation of this development is shown which includes performance tests and qualification of the model at the level of precision and robustness. Particularly, an industrial test bench from Safran Aero Boosters is simulated, comprising an acoustic source and a set of baffles in a 3.6m long duct, followed by an anechoic room.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue28th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics 2022 ConferenceSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207