MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282826325 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzac054.051

Transitioning to Sustainable Dietary Patterns: Learnings From the Dietary Patterns of Adults With Low Animal Protein Consumption in the Province of Quebec

2022· article· en· W4282826325 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gabrielle Rochefort, Didier Brassard, Julie Robitaille, Véronique Provencher, Simone Lemieux, Benoı̂t Lamarche

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuartileFood groupAnimal foodNutrientConsumption (sociology)Environmental healthMedicinePolyunsaturated fatty acidFood consumptionFood scienceAnimal scienceBiologyFatty acidInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sustainable diet paradigm rests, among others, on the replacement of animal proteins by plant-based proteins. Our aim was to provide insights on the food and nutrient characteristics of a dietary pattern consistent with lower intakes of animal proteins among French Canadians. Analyses were conducted in 1147 French-speaking adults (50.2% female, mean age 42.8y) of the PRÉDicteurs Individuels, Sociaux et Environnementaux (PREDISE) study in Québec. Dietary intakes were evaluated using a validated web-based 24hr dietary recall (R24W) repeated on three unannounced occasions. Foods were classified according to the 2019 Canada's Food Guide (CFG) food categories and consumption was expressed as reference amount (RA) or nutrient amounts (in g or mg) per 2000kcal. Diet quality was assessed using the Healthy Eating Food Index-2019, a new index that reflects adherence to the recommendations on healthy food choices in 2019 CFG. Animal protein consumption was classified into quartiles and differences in food and nutrient intakes as well as in the HEFI-2019 score between quartiles were assessed using linear regression models adjusted for age and sex as well as for multiple comparisons. Compared with those in the highest quartile of animal protein consumption, participants in the lowest quartile reported consuming more plant-based protein foods (+0.4 RA/2000 kcal; 95%CI 0.2;0.6), refined grains (+0.3 RA/2000 kcal; 95% CI 0.1;0.5), foods not recommended in CFG 2019 (+1.5 RA/2000 kcal; 95%CI 1.0;2.0), polyunsaturated fatty acids (+2.5g/2000 kcal; 95%CI 1.4;3.5) and free sugars (+20.0g/2000 kcal; 95%CI 14.0;26.0). They also consumed less monounsaturated fatty acids (−1.8g/2000 kcal; 95%CI −3.2; −0.4), saturated fats (−7.3g/2000 kcal; 95%CI −8.8; −5.9) and sodium (-349 mg/2000 kcal; 95%CI -510; -188). The HEFI-2019 score was similar among quartiles of animal protein consumption. The dietary pattern of French-Canadian adults who consume lesser amounts of animal proteins is not entirely consistent with better diet quality. These results highlight some of the challenges in transitioning the dietary habits of French Canadian adults into more sustainable and healthier patterns. Canadian Institute for Health Research, Centre Nutrition, Santé et Société-NUTRISS and Fonds de nutrition publique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207