PENGARUH KOMPLEKSITAS AUDIT DAN TIME BUDGET PRESSURE TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT PADA KANTOR AKUNTAN PUBLIK DI PEKANBARU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan mendapatkan bukti empiris pengaruh kompleksitas audit dan time budget pressure terhadap kualitas audit pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Pekanbaru. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah auditor yang bekerja pada 9 KAP di Pekanbaru. Pemilihan sampel dilakukan dengan cara convienience sampling, sehingga jumlah sampel yaitu 42 responden yang sesuai kreteria. Alat uji yang digunakan adalah regresi linear berganda dengan menggunakan software SPSS versi 26 untuk mengolah data. Berdasarkan hasil analisa data, disimpulkan bahwa secara parsial kompleksitas audit berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit. Time budget pressure secara parsial berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit. Hasil anova atau uji F menunjukkan bahwa variabel kompleksitas audit dan time budget pressure secara bersama-sama berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".