MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SPEAR: Systematic ProtEin AnnotatoR

2022· article· en· W4282834074 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Crown, Natália Teruel, Rafaël Najmanovich, Matthew Bashton

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersRéseau Québécois de Recherche sur les Médicaments
KeywordsSpearPython (programming language)Computer scienceAnnotationDocumentationVisualizationComputational biologyData miningBiologyProgramming languageArtificial intelligenceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: We present Systematic ProtEin AnnotatoR (SPEAR), a lightweight and rapid SARS-CoV-2 variant annotation and scoring tool, for identifying mutations contributing to potential immune escape and transmissibility (ACE2 binding) at point of sequencing. SPEAR can be used in the field to evaluate genomic surveillance results in real time and features a powerful interactive data visualization report. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SPEAR and documentation are freely available on GitHub: https://github.com/m-crown/SPEAR and are implemented in Python and installable via Conda environment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0060.008
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0790.150

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207