Early Onset Diffusion Abnormalities in Refractory Headache Disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective This study sought to determine if individuals with medically refractory migraine headache have volume or diffusion abnormalities on neuroimaging compared to neurotypical individuals. Background Neuroimaging biomarkers in headache medicine continue to be limited. Early prediction of medically refractory headache and migraine disorders could result in earlier administration of high efficacy therapeutics. Methods A single-center, retrospective, case control study was performed. All patients were evaluated clinically between 2014 and 2018. Individuals with medically refractory migraine headache (defined by ICDH-3 criteria) without any other chronic medical diseases were enrolled. Patients had to have failed more than two therapeutics and aura was not exclusionary. The initial MRI study for each patient was reviewed. Multiple brain regions were analyzed for volume and apparent diffusion coefficient values. These were compared to 81 neurotypical control patients. Results A total of 79 patients with medically refractory migraine headache were included and compared to 74 neurotypical controls without headache disorders. Time between clinical diagnosis and neuroimaging was a median of 24 months (IQR: 12.0–37.0). Comparison of individuals with medically refractory migraine headache to controls revealed statistically significant differences in median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in multiple brain subregions (p < 0.001). Post-hoc pair-wise analysis comparing individuals with medically refractory migraine headache to control patients revealed significantly decreased median ADC values for the thalamus, caudate, putamen, pallidum, amygdala, brainstem, and cerebral white matter. No volumetric differences were observed between groups. Conclusions In individuals with medically refractory MH, ADC changes are measurable in multiple brain structures at an early age, prior to the failure of multiple pharmacologic interventions and the diagnosis of medically refractory MH. This data supports the hypothesis that structural connectivity issues may predispose some patients toward more medically refractory pain disorders such as MH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".