A quantitative study of the dynamic response of compliant microfluidic chips in a microfluidics context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is a widely used material for microfluidic devices due to its low cost, superior optical properties and fast iterative design process. Its softness however creates challenges for the device design and operation because part of the applied pressures contributes to deform chips instead of controlling the flow. The resulting dynamic behaviour is often ignored in passive microfluidic that focuses on the static behaviour of the chip, however, can cause low accuracy to active microfluidic that actuates flow frequently. Therefore, understanding the dynamic behaviour of microfluidic devices due to material compliance is of fundamental and practical importance. In this study, the microfluidic chip compliance is carefully considered by separating it from the sample tubing compliance. The capacitance is retrieved by assuming a symmetric RC circuit based on the experimentally determined time constant and chip resistance. The experimental capacitance is compared to a theoretical formula for chip designs with different height-to-width ratios and height-to-length ratios and for various fluids. The accuracy is within one order of magnitude that is much closer than previous approximations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".