The Amount of Dietary Methionine Required to Maximize Synthesis of Transmethylated Products Is Higher Than That Needed for Protein Synthesis in Neonatal Piglets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methionine is an indispensable sulfur-containing amino acid required for synthesizing protein as well as other critical nutrients. Methionine is the primary methyl donor for >50 transmethylation reactions to produce metabolites including creatine, phosphatidylcholine (PC), and methylated DNA. In piglets, because only one-third of methionine flux is incorporated into protein compared to transmethylation reactions (∼2/3), non-protein demands need to be considered when determining methionine requirement. Our objective was to quantify how much dietary methionine is required to maximize synthesis of protein as well as key transmethylated products. We hypothesized that more dietary methionine will be needed to maximize creatine synthesis, with lower levels required to maximize PC and protein synthesis. Twenty surgically altered Yucatan miniature piglets (∼8 d old; ∼1.6 kg) were fed complete diets for 5 d and then randomized to 20 test diets with methionine intakes ranging from 20%-220% of requirement (0.05–0.55 g/kg/d). After 24 h of test diet, [3H-methyl]-methionine was infused for 6 h to measure methyl incorporation into creatine, PC, and methylated DNA, and then a3H-phenylalanine flooding dose was given to measure protein synthesis. Break-point analysis was used to identify the methionine required to maximize product synthesis. Plasma methionine increased above 0.3 g methionine/kg/d, reflecting the whole body requirement. Creatine synthesis maximized at ∼0.3 g methionine/kg/d, while muscle protein synthesis was maximized at 0.2 g methionine/kg/d, suggesting growth is prioritized when methionine is limiting. PC synthesis was low up to 0.35 g methionine/kg/d and increased linearly with higher intakes, suggesting PC synthesis was not maximized at 200% of requirement.3H-DNA did not change with dietary methionine, and plasma homocysteine was positively correlated with dietary methionine. These data suggest that more methionine is required to accommodate demands for creatine and PC synthesis than that for protein synthesis. Therefore, methionine requirement estimates for infants, which rely on protein synthesis outcomes, are likely insufficient to achieve maximal synthesis of key methylated metabolites creatine and PC. NSERC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".