CLEAR: Cluster-Enhanced Contrast for Self-Supervised Graph Representation Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article studies self-supervised graph representation learning, which is critical to various tasks, such as protein property prediction. Existing methods typically aggregate representations of each individual node as graph representations, but fail to comprehensively explore local substructures (i.e., motifs and subgraphs), which also play important roles in many graph mining tasks. In this article, we propose a self-supervised graph representation learning framework named cluster-enhanced Contrast (CLEAR) that models the structural semantics of a graph from graph-level and substructure-level granularities, i.e., global semantics and local semantics, respectively. Specifically, we use graph-level augmentation strategies followed by a graph neural network-based encoder to explore global semantics. As for local semantics, we first use graph clustering techniques to partition each whole graph into several subgraphs while preserving as much semantic information as possible. We further employ a self-attention interaction module to aggregate the semantics of all subgraphs into a local-view graph representation. Moreover, we integrate both global semantics and local semantics into a multiview graph contrastive learning framework, enhancing the semantic-discriminative ability of graph representations. Extensive experiments on various real-world benchmarks demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed over current graph self-supervised representation learning approaches on both graph classification and transfer learning tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it