Linked-Read Sequencing of Eight Falcons Reveals a Unique Genomic Architecture in Flux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Falcons are diverse birds of cultural and economic importance. They have undergone major lineage-specific chromosomal rearrangements, resulting in greatly-reduced chromosome counts relative to other birds. Here, we use 10X Genomics linked reads to provide new high-contiguity genomes for two gyrfalcons, a saker falcon, a lanner falcon, three subspecies of peregrine falcons, and the common kestrel. Assisted by a transcriptome sequenced from 22 gyrfalcon tissues, we annotate these genomes for a variety of genomic features, estimate historical demography, and then investigate genomic equilibrium in the context of falcon-specific chromosomal rearrangements. We find that falcon genomes are not in AT-GC equilibrium with a bias in substitutions towards higher AT content; this bias is predominantly but not exclusively driven by hypermutability of CpG sites. Small indels and large structural variants were also biased towards insertions rather than deletions. Patterns of disequilibrium were linked to chromosomal rearrangements: falcons have lost GC content in regions that have fused to larger chromosomes from microchromosomes and gained GC content in regions of macrochromosomes that have translocated to microchromosomes. Inserted bases have accumulated on regions ancestrally belonging to microchromosomes, consistent with insertion-biased gene conversion. We also find an excess of interspersed repeats on regions of microchromosomes that have fused to macrochromosomes. Our results reveal that falcon genomes are in a state of flux. They further suggest that many of the key differences between microchromosomes and macrochromosomes are driven by differences in chromosome size, and indicate a clear role for recombination and biased-gene-conversion in determining genomic equilibrium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".