MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282918298 · doi:10.1358/dot.2022.58.6.3400572

Bimekizumab for psoriasis

2022· article· en· W4282918298 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Alexandra Rodrigues, Egídio Freitas, Tiago Torres

Bibliographic record

VenueDrugs of today · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSecukinumabPsoriasisUstekinumabTolerabilityAdalimumabAdverse effectDermatologyImmunologyImmune systemPopulationInternal medicineTumor necrosis factor alphaPsoriatic arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory skin disease, affecting 1% to 3% of the population in Western countries. Due to advances in the understanding of psoriasis pathogenesis, in particular, the role of the interleukin-23 (IL-23)/T-helper 17 (Th17) immune axis, highly effective, targeted biologic therapies have been developed, shifting the psoriasis treatment paradigm. However, some patients do not respond or lose response to these novel therapies. Bimekizumab is a first-in-class humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody that potently and selectively inhibits both IL-17A and IL-17F, functioning as a dual inhibitor. All bimekizumab studies have shown high efficacy in psoriasis patients. Its onset of response was rapid and sustained for periods up to 60 weeks. In active-comparator trials to date, bimekizumab was superior to adalimumab (BE SURE), ustekinumab (BE VIVID) and secukinumab (BE RADIANT). It has demonstrated a consistent safety profile and high tolerability. The most common adverse events were largely restricted to mucosal candidiasis. Dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F with bimekizumab showed to be a highly effective treatment for psoriasis, and the product is already approved for treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Europe, Canada and Japan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrugs of todaySame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207