MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282922816 · doi:10.1142/s2010326322500447

On the analytic structure of second-order non-commutative probability spaces and functions of bounded Fréchet variation

2022· article· en· W4282922816 on OpenAlexafffund
Mario Díaz, James A. Mingo

Bibliographic record

VenueRandom Matrices Theory and Application · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsCentral limit theoremBounded functionCovarianceDifferentiable functionOperator normCovariance operatorCauchy distributionRandom matrixLimit (mathematics)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisStatisticsEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a new approach to the central limit theorem (CLT) based on functions of bounded Fréchet variation for the continuously differentiable linear statistics of random matrix ensembles which relies on a weaker form of a large deviation principle for the operator norm; a Poincaré-type inequality for the linear statistics; and the existence of a second-order limit distribution. This approach frames into a single setting many known random matrix ensembles and as a consequence, classical central limit theorems for linear statistics are recovered and new ones are established, e.g. the CLT for the continuously differentiable linear statistics of block Gaussian matrices. In addition, our main results contribute to the understanding of the analytical structure of second-order non-commutative probability spaces. On the one hand, they pinpoint the source of the unbounded nature of the bilinear functional associated to these spaces; on the other hand, they lead to a general archetype for the integral representation of the second-order Cauchy transform, [Formula: see text]. Furthermore, we establish that the covariance of resolvents converges to this transform and that the limiting covariance of analytic linear statistics can be expressed as a contour integral in [Formula: see text].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRandom Matrices Theory and ApplicationSame topicRandom Matrices and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207