Gestational age-related changes in the fetal functional connectome: in utero evidence for the global signal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The human brain begins to develop in the third gestational week and rapidly grows and matures over the course of pregnancy. Compared to fetal structural neurodevelopment, less is known about emerging functional connectivity in utero. Here, we investigated gestational age (GA)-associated in vivo changes in functional brain connectivity during the second and third trimesters in a large dataset of 110 resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans from a cohort of 95 healthy fetuses. Using representational similarity analysis, a multivariate analytical technique that reveals pair-wise similarity in high-order space, we showed that intersubject similarity of fetal functional connectome patterns was strongly related to between-subject GA differences (r = 0.28, P < 0.01) and that GA sensitivity of functional connectome was lateralized, especially at the frontal area. Our analysis also revealed a subnetwork of connections that were critical for predicting age (mean absolute error = 2.72 weeks); functional connectome patterns of individual fetuses reliably predicted their GA (r = 0.51, P < 0.001). Lastly, we identified the primary principal brain network that tracked fetal brain maturity. The main network showed a global synchronization pattern resembling global signal in the adult brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".