Radical Complexes of Nickel(II)/Copper(II) and Redox Non‐innocent MB‐DIPY Ligands: Unusual Stability and Strong Near‐Infrared Absorption at <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub> ∼1300 nm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The preparation of radicals with intense and redox‐switchable absorption beyond 1000 nm is a long‐standing challenge in the chemistry of functional dyes. Here we report the preparation of a series of unprecedented stable neutral nickel(II) and copper(II) complexes of “Manitoba dipyrromethenes” (MB‐DIPYs) in which the organic chromophore is present in the radical‐anion state. The new stable radicals have an intense absorption at λmax∼1300 nm and can be either oxidized to regular [MII(MB‐DIPY)]+ (M=Cu or Ni) or reduced to [MII(MB‐DIPY)]− compounds. The radical nature of the stable [MII(MB‐DIPY)] complexes was confirmed by EPR spectroscopy with additional insight into their electronic structure obtained by UV‐Vis spectroscopy, electro‐ and spectroelectrochemistry, magnetic measurements, and X‐ray crystallography. The electronic structures and spectroscopic properties of the radical‐based chromophores were also probed by density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent DFT (TDDFT) calculations. These nickel(II) and copper(II) complexes represent the first stable radical compounds with a MB‐DIPY ligand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".