Abstract 1155: cBioPortal for cancer genomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics is an open-source platform for interactive, exploratory analysis of large-scale cancer genomics data sets. cBioPortal provides a user-friendly interface that integrates genomic and clinical data, and provides a suite of visualizations and analyses, including OncoPrints, mutation “lollipop” plots, variant interpretation, group comparison, survival analysis, expression correlation analysis, alteration enrichment analysis, cohort and patient-level visualization. cBioPortal also integrates external tools including CIViC, Cancer Digital Slide Archive, Next-Generation Clustered Heat Map, IGV and Bioconductor to facilitate interpretation. The public site (https://www.cbioportal.org) is accessed by ~35,000 unique visitors each month and hosts data from >325 studies spanning individual labs and large consortia. In addition, >67 instances of cBioPortal are installed at academic institutions and pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies worldwide. In 2021 we added data from 32 studies, totaling >24,000 samples, to the public site. All data is also available in the cBioPortal Datahub: https://github.com/cBioPortal/datahub/. We also host a dedicated instance for AACR Project GENIE, enabling access to the GENIE cohort of >135,000 clinically sequenced samples from 19 institutions (https://genie.cbioportal.org). In addition, the GENIE Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) enables the collection of comprehensive clinical annotations, including response, outcome, and treatment histories. The first BPC release contains data from >1,800 non-small cell lung cancer samples and will be released in early 2022. The growing GENIE cohort and the BPC clinical data have driven a number of recent developments, including performance improvements (the load time for the GENIE cohort was reduced from minutes to seconds). To leverage the BPC clinical data, we enabled sample selection based on treatment status, extended support for outcome analysis, and enhanced the patient timeline representation to incorporate response data. Additional development work has focused on improvements to variant interpretation, enhancements to the Mutations tab, and support for novel molecular assays via the ‘generic assay’ data type. Documentation on these new features and many others is available at https://www.cbioportal.org/news. cBioPortal is fully open source (https://github.com/cBioPortal/) under a GNU Affero GPL license. Development is a collaborative effort among groups at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Bilkent University and The Hyve. We welcome open source contributions from others in the cancer research community. Citation Format: Jianjiong Gao, Tali Mazor, Ino de Bruijn, Adam Abeshouse, Diana Baiceanu, Ziya Erkoc, Elena Garcia Lara, Benjamin Gross, David M. Higgins, Prasanna K. Jagannathan, Priti Kumari, Ritika Kundra, Xiang Li, James Lindsay, Aaron Lisman, Divya Madala, Ramyasree Madupuri, Angelica Ochoa, Oleguer Plantalech, Sander Rodenburg, Baby A. Satravada, Robert Sheridan, Lucas Sikina, Jessica Singh, S. Onur Sumer, Yichao Sun, Pim van Nierop, Avery Wang, Manda Wilson, Hongxin Zhang, Gaofei Zhao, Sjoerd van Hagen, Kees van Bochove, Ugur Dogrusoz, Allison Heath, Adam Resnick, Trevor J. Pugh, Chris Sander, Ethan Cerami, Nikolaus Schultz. cBioPortal for cancer genomics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1155.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.119 | 0.123 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".