Model-Based Quantitative Elasticity Reconstruction Using ADMM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We introduce two model-based iterative methods to obtain shear modulus images of tissue using magnetic resonance elastography. The first method jointly finds the displacement field that best fits tissue displacement data and the corresponding shear modulus. The displacement satisfies a viscoelastic wave equation constraint, discretized using the finite element method. Sparsifying regularization terms in both shear modulus and displacement are used in the cost function minimized for the best fit. The second method extends the first method for multifrequency tissue displacement data. The formulated problems are bi-convex. Their solution can be obtained iteratively by using the alternating direction method of multipliers. Sparsifying regularizations and the wave equation constraint filter out sensor noise and compressional waves. Our methods do not require bandpass filtering as a preprocessing step and converge fast irrespective of the initialization. We evaluate our new methods in multiple in silico and phantom experiments, with comparisons with existing methods, and we show improvements in contrast to noise and signal-to-noise ratios. Results from an in vivo liver imaging study show elastograms with mean elasticity comparable to other values reported in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".